iThe Railway Children. By E. Nesbit. Illustrated by C.E. Brock. London: Wells Gardner, Darton & Co., 1906.
E. Nesbit’s The Railway Children is 101. My edition claims that it has been continuously in print since its publication in 1906. Despite this, the book is remarkably unknown in the United States, where, when you mention it, people generally think you’re referring to The Box Car Children or The Trolley Car Family, both wonderful books in their own ways, but utterly different from The Railway Children, which is as complex a book as you could imagine, one that is ideally read repeatedly over the years in order to glean from it its many meanings.
It concerns three children—Roberta, Peter, and Phyllis—who live an idyllic existence in suburban London until one day, quite abruptly, their father disappears, just after promising to repair Peter’s train engine, which was broken “owing either to Peter’s inexperience or Phyllis’s good intentions.” Well, their father doesn’t disappear so much as he appears to leave the house in the company of two gentlemen callers after a conversation overheard by the children in which “Father’s voice sounded louder and different from the voice he generally used to people who came about testimonials and holiday funds.” After their mother is drawn into this unusual conversation in the library, “the children heard boots go out and down the steps,” and their mother returns to them, her face as white as her collar, to impart the news that their father has been called away on business for some time. Shortly thereafter, they begin to pack for their removal to country, taking all of the useful things and none of the beautiful ones. After a lengthy journey by rail, they arrive at the cottage that is to be their new home, to discover no lights lit, no fire laid, no supper waiting, and rats. And still they have no idea as to what has really happened to their father.
That evening, they themselves tidy the dining room, and light the fire, and break into their packing-cases to retrieve a supper of Marie biscuits, sardines, preserved ginger, cooking raisins, candied peel and marmalade. But the excitement begins on the next morning, when after laying out the breakfast things as best they can, and putting the kettle on for tea, they begin to explore the area around the cottage. Failing to locate the garden, they observe the railway line below them, and sit down to watch for trains, and fall asleep in the sun on the great grey stones of the hillside. This glimpse of the rail line is the first glimpse of what will sustain them in the months to come: the railway, the trains, the station and the men who work there become their community and their companions, as they embark upon a variety of adventures, adventures at once untrammeled and yet constrained by the need to allow Mother as much quiet and time to write as she needs in order to support them in their new circumstances. And so the book is one of discovery and adventure and many rescues, including their own.
But really it is about so much more. The Railway Children is about the way in which people organize themselves and their lives around unspeakable information, around absence. It’s about the difficult choices that parents make—to tell the children everything or to keep them in ignorance—and the burden of knowledge that children bear in any event. It’s about coincidences and accidents of timing. Nesbit doesn’t leave her readers alone with these ideas, but interjects herself as a commentator frequently, helping children to sort out the complexities of people’s behavior, and their odd ways of expressing themselves, among other things. It is also profoundly about social class, and what it is to be on the margins of the class system, as these children are for the course of the novel. For, once liberated from their middle-class existence of servants and lessons, too poor for tutors and too middle-class for the village school, they are suddenly free to roam the countryside, free to enter into the lives of station porters and signalmen bargemen, of refugees and boarding school boys and doctors. They are free, therefore, to observe the troubles of these people: the prickly pride of workers who refuse to be objects of pity, the struggles to make ends meet at all levels of the social scale, the grief and despair of dislocation—and free to be liberated from their own unnamed troubles at the same time.